All Rights Reserved
AccessEcon LLC 2006, 2008.
Powered by MinhViet JSC
ralph lauren polo

 
Roberto Serrano
 
''The Measurement of Intellectual Influence: the Views of a Sceptic''
( 2004, Vol. 1 No.3 )
 
 
In an extremely interesting paper, Palacios-Huerta and Volij (2004) [PV] introduce the axiomatic method to the problem of how to rank academic journals on the basis of their mutual citations. They characterize the invariant method as the only one satisfying a list of five appealing properties. In this note, I show an impossibility result, by identifying a sixth property that is violated by the invariant method. Further, I question the appeal of the PV axioms, when applied over larger domains of problems that take into account making distinctions among types of citations.
 
 
Keywords:
JEL: A0 - General Economics and Teaching
C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory:General
 
Manuscript Received : Jul 12 2004 Manuscript Accepted : Sep 14 2004

  This abstract has been downloaded 866 times                The Full PDF of this paper has been downloaded 87732 times