All Rights Reserved
AccessEcon LLC 2006, 2008.
Powered by MinhViet JSC
ralph lauren polo

 
Elisabetta Ottoz and Franco Cugno
 
''The independent invention defence in a Cournot duopoly model''
( 2004, Vol. 12 No.5 )
 
 
Maurer and Scotchmer (2002) pointed out that patents may be inferior to other forms of intellectual property in that the independent invention is not a defence to infringement. The authors' analysis refers to situations in which there is an unlimited number of potential entrants by independent duplication. If independent invention were a defence to infringement, the continual threat of entry would induce the patent-holder to license its technology on terms that commit to a lower output price, and this is where the social benefit lies. In this note we extend the analysis to the case of a single potential entrant when the law impose certain restrictions on the contracts that patent holders and licensees can subscribe. We show that these legal restrictions may be partial substitutes for the continual threat of entry by as yet unidentified subjects.
 
 
Keywords: Cournot duopoly
JEL: L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance: General
O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development: General
 
Manuscript Received : Apr 22 2004 Manuscript Accepted : Jun 20 2004

  This abstract has been downloaded 1134 times                The Full PDF of this paper has been downloaded 104256 times