All Rights Reserved
AccessEcon LLC 2006, 2008.
Powered by MinhViet JSC

Jason Taylor and Fred Bateman
''Does the distribution of New Deal spending reflect an optimal provision of public goods?''
( 2007, Vol. 8 No.3 )
Since 1969 more than a dozen studies have explored the grossly unequal state-level distribution of New Deal spending. Why did small population rural states such as Nevada, Montana, and Wyoming receive up to six times as many federal dollars per capita as densely populated states such as Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New York? Empirical studies employing economic and political variables have had mixed results in explaining this distribution. What past studies neglect is that a large proportion of New Deal dollars went towards the creation of public goods, which had spillover effects particularly upon those who lived in close proximity to these projects. This note suggests that the state-level distribution of per capita expenditures during the 1930s is consistent with what would be expected to follow from an economically efficient allocation of public goods.
JEL: H4 - Publicly Provided Goods: General
N4 - Economic History: Government, War, Law, and Regulation: General, International, or Comparative
Manuscript Received : Mar 12 2007 Manuscript Accepted : Apr 02 2007

  This abstract has been downloaded 3984 times                The Full PDF of this paper has been downloaded 153793 times