All Rights Reserved
AccessEcon LLC 2006, 2008.
Powered by MinhViet JSC
ralph lauren polo

Yasunori Okumura
''A note on Propositions 7 and 8 of Goyal and Moraga (2001)''
( 2007, Vol. 12 No.28 )
We will show that some results in Goyal and Moraga (2001), RAND Journal of Economics 32(4), are incomplete. The results are the social welfare and the total profit of the firms in the complete network is lower than those in some networks. They focus on the symmetric network gk where k is the number of links of each firm and show that the social welfare (the total profit of the firms) in the complete network gn-1 is lower than that in gn-2 where n is the number of the firms. However, their proofs are incomplete because there is no gn-2 if n is odd. Therefore, this paper gives the complete proof of their result. That is, since there is gn-3 if n is odd, we show the social welfare (total profit) in the gn-1 is lower than that in the network gn-3.
Keywords: Symmetric networks: Network formation: R&D Oligopoly Graph theory
JEL: L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance: General
C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory:General
Manuscript Received : Oct 21 2007 Manuscript Accepted : Oct 22 2007

  This abstract has been downloaded 702 times                The Full PDF of this paper has been downloaded 96935 times