All Rights Reserved
AccessEcon LLC 2006, 2008.
Powered by MinhViet JSC
ralph lauren polo

 
Andrea Morone
 
''Comparison of Mean-Variance Theory and Expected-Utility Theory through a Laboratory Experiment''
( 2008, Vol. 3 No.40 )
 
 
In the 40's and early 50''s two decision theories were proposed and have dominated the scene of the fascinating field of decision-making. Since 1944 - when von Neumann and Morgenstern showed that if preferences are consistent with a set of axioms then it is possible to represent these preferences by the expectation of some utility function - Expected Utility theory provides a natural way to establish "measurable utility". In the early 50''s Markowitz introduced the Mean-Variance theory that is the basis of modern portfolio selection theory. Since then, both models were analyzed from virtually all possible points of view and were tested against several generalizations. However, these two models should be tested against each other. This paper tries to fill this gap, investigating (using experimental data) which of these two models better approximate subjects'' preferences.
 
 
Keywords: preference functional
JEL: C9 - Design of Experiments: General
G1 - General Financial Markets: General (includes Measurement and Data)
 
Manuscript Received : Aug 07 2008 Manuscript Accepted : Aug 08 2008

  This abstract has been downloaded 352 times                The Full PDF of this paper has been downloaded 87731 times